Please note: We DO NOT offer free tax advice for TurboTax users or self-preparers.

Understanding Michigan's New Cannabis Tax Litigation

Michigan has become a focal point in the cannabis policy landscape, spurred by the introduction of a 24% wholesale marijuana tax that faces a critical legal challenge. As the courtroom proceedings begin, this case has gained national interest due to its potential to impact cannabis pricing and the broader implications for voter-endorsed legislation and tax frameworks nationwide.

Whether or not you reside in Michigan or partake in cannabis consumption, this case bears watching. It might set a precedent influencing how states construct, amend, and uphold cannabis tax policies, possibly offering a foresight into emerging legal confrontations as the sector expands.

Here's what the public should be aware of.

The Proposed Tax Structure in Michigan

Within its 2025–2026 budget, Michigan has sanctioned a 24% wholesale cannabis tax, forecasted to fund road enhancements. This tax targets the supply chain initially, before products reach retail outlets.

Currently, Michigan imposes two taxes:

  • A 10% excise tax on retail cannabis, approved in 2018

  • A 6% state sales tax

Should this wholesale tax be implemented, Michigan would present one of the most complex cannabis tax frameworks in the U.S.

Rationale Behind the Industry's Legal Challenge

The Michigan Cannabis Industry Association (MCIA) argues that the tax constitutes an unconstitutional act, hinging on a critical argument:

The 2018 voter-sanctioned marijuana statute is inviolate without a supermajority legislative vote.

The Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA), enacted through direct voter support, restricts legislative amendments unless a three-fourths supermajority is achieved.

The legislative passage of the wholesale tax occurred with a simple majority.

MCIA spokesperson Rose Tantraphol noted the gravity of the situation: “As the leading cannabis trade association, we stand in court to uphold Michigan voters’ decisions.” (Source: Michigan Advance)

Industry professionals warn that this tax would elevate costs, burden small enterprises, and potentially reroute consumers to unregulated channels, as seen in high-tax jurisdictions like California.

The State’s Justification

Michigan's administration contends the tax's legality due to:

  • Its characterization as a new levy, not an amendment of the 2018 voter-endorsed cannabis statute

  • The legislative competence to establish taxes for fiscal objectives

  • Intent focused on funding transportation infrastructure, not the reshaping of cannabis policies

Should the court side with the state, the tax may still be enacted starting January 1, 2026.

Potential Consumer Implications

Non-Michigan residents should note that cannabis tax configurations often set cross-state precedents. If upheld, the tax could:

  • Drive up wholesale prices

  • Push retail prices higher to offset costs

  • Encourage consumers towards more affordable, unauthorized markets

  • Consolidate smaller market players under fiscal pressure

If overturned, Michigan will maintain its existing, cost-efficient tax scheme.

National Relevance of the Case

This Michigan case, although localized, has nationwide ramifications.

1. It probes the resilience of voter-sanctioned laws

If legislative taxation can bypass supermajority consent, this could alter ballot initiatives’ operations across states.

2. It could shape other states’ cannabis tax policies

Underfunded states could mimic Michigan's model should the tax withstand the lawsuit.

3. It underscores the national variability in cannabis taxation

While some states maintain moderate taxes to sustain competitiveness, states like California experience tax-induced illicit market growth.

The litigation might become a strategic template for similar protests elsewhere.

Next Steps

Having heard initial arguments, a Michigan Court of Claims judge is anticipated to render a ruling imminently. The matter could advance to the Michigan Supreme Court.

No matter the decision, its significance will resonate — shaping not just Michigan's cannabis economy but potentially setting benchmarks for how states approach voter-driven legislation, burgeoning industries, and taxation permissions nationwide.

Cannabis Tax Discussions

Share this article...

Want our best tax and accounting tips and insights delivered to your inbox?

Sign up for our newsletter.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .
Have a question? Check out the frequently asked questions below.
Hi there! Welcome to Steve Shapiro, EA website. For any questions not listed here, use the Ask Me A Question form and one of our staff will reach out to you.
Please fill out the form and our team will get back to you shortly The form was sent successfully