Please note: We DO NOT offer free tax advice for TurboTax users or self-preparers.
Legal Battle to Make Pets Dependents for Tax Purposes
If you’ve ever reviewed your pet’s vet bills, grooming costs, premium food charges, and thought to yourself, “This pet is practically my dependent,” you aren’t alone. One New York attorney is taking this notion a step further by pressing this argument in a federal court case.
In December 2025, attorney Amanda Reynolds initiated a lawsuit against the IRS, contending that her eight-year-old golden retriever, Finnegan, should be classified as a dependent for federal tax purposes.
While the case appears peculiar, it raises a salient question many taxpayers ponder annually: “Are any pet-related expenses deductible, and if not, why?”
Below is an examination of the case, applicable tax laws, and exceptional circumstances where the IRS permits tax benefits linked to animals.
The Legal Argument: “My Dog Fits the Dependent Criteria”
Reynolds asserts in her lawsuit that Finnegan satisfies IRS dependent qualifications because:
He permanently resides with her,
He has no income of his own, and
She covers more than half of his care costs, totaling over $5,000 annually for essentials such as food, medical care, and daycare.
A national news source reflecting on the case highlights her argument: “For all practical purposes, Finnegan resembles a child, thus qualifying as a ‘dependent,’” as expressed in her legal complaint.
Reynolds further places emphasis on constitutional perspectives, alleging species-based discriminatory treatment amongst dependents (an Equal Protection issue) and that failure to acknowledge pets as dependents amounts to an unconstitutional “taking” (a Fifth Amendment issue).
Current Status of the Case
This case proceeds in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, though it currently remains largely inactive.
A federal magistrate has authorized a stay on discovery—freezing the information exchange process—as the IRS readies a motion for dismissal.
In the court's decision, the presiding judge considers the case as an introduction to a “novel but pressing inquiry” regarding domestic pets’ status as ‘dependents’ but cautions about the complexities ahead. The government argues persuasively that these claims seem “fundamentally ungrounded” and are unlikely to withstand dismissal.
In summary, this lawsuit exists and is under active review, gaining considerable interest yet facing significant judicial doubt of success.
Why Pets Are Excluded from Dependent Classification in Federal Tax Law
The principal legal challenge within this case lies in the tax code’s explicit definition of dependents as “individuals.”
According to Internal Revenue Code Section 152, a dependent equates to a “qualifying child” or “qualifying relative,” with repeated usage of “individual” denoting a human being historically.
The IRS forms and guidelines don’t offer any route to list pets as dependents. Dependents require Social Security or taxpayer identification numbers, and the related tax credits and deductions are structured around personal and familial human relationships.
Although Reynolds posits Finnegan meets the functional dependency criteria (such as a lack of income, cohabitation, and fiscal dependence), the existing tax framework does not equate animals to dependent “individuals.”
Available Tax Benefits for Animals
Typically, ordinary pet expenses aren’t deductible, but significant exceptions do exist. This part of the article constitutes practical tax advice:
1) Potential Medical Deductions for Service Animals
Costs associated with a trained service animal aiding a disability might qualify as medical expenses should you choose to itemize deductions.
The IRS accounts medical costs as deductible when itemized and surpass the designated AGI limit. This includes expenses tied to the acquisition, training, and upkeep of a service animal as medically necessary.
Critical clarification for readers: emotional support animals are not officially recognized as service animals under federal law; service animals perform tasks explicitly linked to a disability.
2) Business Expense Deductions for Working Animals
In particular instances, animals are part of a legitimate trade or business scenario, for instance:
An effective guard dog safeguarding business premises, or
Utility animals involved in business pest control.
In such situations, some routine expenses could be deemed ordinary and necessary business expenses where proper documentation and a genuine business rationale exist.
Your original source also highlights this nuanced approach among IRS-permitted animal tax breaks.
3) Charitable Deductions Tied to Foster Care for Animals
Taxpayers fostering animals through eligible organizations might deduct some unreimbursed expenses as charitable contributions, again contingent on rigorous compliance and recordkeeping.
Conclusive Insights for Taxpayers
This litigation presents a striking emotional truth: to many Americans, pets are family, representing genuine financial responsibilities. Nonetheless, tax law relies on precise statutory language—not sentimentality.
Presently:
You cannot list a pet as a dependent on your federal tax return.
Typical pet care costs (including food, grooming, and vet bills for common household pets) categorize as personal, non-deductible expenses.
Certain animal-related expenses may qualify for deductions under specific circumstances—such as service animals, distinct business animals, and possible fostering-related charitable contributions.
The Reynolds case merits attention, not due to expectations of IRS issuing dependent ID numbers for golden retrievers, but as it casts a spotlight on how numerous households emotionally and financially invest in pets, juxtaposed against tax policies firmly differentiating “family” from “property.”
And, crucially, it serves as a reminder: Verify IRS deductibility criteria before assuming automatic eligibility.
Want our best tax and accounting tips and insights delivered to your inbox?
Sign up for our newsletter.